Portraying crime news honestly

Creating a more "honest" portrayal of local crime and the criminal justice system requires a two-part approach.  The first part of the plan involves reeducating the public through local news broadcast.  Support within the news organization and ties to news sources are an initial concern.  After support is in place, the process begins with a change in the news format.  Accurate information on crime is integrating through the use of elegant sound bytes from respected sources, investigative reporting and weekly segments highlighting courts, police, and corrections.  Meanwhile, a simultaneous campaign would be launched attacking the use of statistical scare tactics used to manipulate the public.  News on
Florida’s criminal justice system would also be presented.  The second part involves creating a need for "honest" news.  This can be achieved through indoctrinating school-aged kids into the process.  A marriage between journalism and education must be made to ensure that children desire and demand honest portrayals of crime in the news.  


This project relies on that everyone being in agreement on the idea of accurately reporting crime news.  Likewise, we must have money to perform our tasks. Our commercials must also tell the story of how we are determined to portray the news in an "honest" fashion with out all the hype.  When this is in place the process begins.


For my first priority, I would seek to establish friendships with key officials in the police force courts and prisons.  In exchange for a primarily positive spin in representation of their organizations, my team and I would seek open access to the courts and prisons.  I would explain that my objective was to de-vilify participants in the criminal justice system through educating the public on what really happens in the system.  Also, I would cultivate goodwill between our newsroom and others who monitor nontraditional crime such as Fish and Game Commission, Securities and Exchange Commission, Federal Communication Commission and the IRS.


My station would revamp the news hour.  It would be divided up like mini segments similar to CNN where you know what time to tune in for specific types of news.  The
5:00 p.m. news would be divided like this.
5:00 Top stories
5:03 - 5:08 Police, Courts, Corrections
5:10 National news as it impacts our lives
5:14 commercial break
5:18 LOCALS
5:20 - 5:28 Business, Sports, Weather, 
End with a happy story or goofy picture of people enjoying life.

We would start with an aggressive campaign to educate the public.  We would have experts such local government officials, police officials and criminologist address the public in elegant sound bytes stating the infrequency of violent crimes.  The public education campaign would be integrated into the crime news segment of the newscast.  Exciting graphic displays and pictures would be spliced into the story with the expert speaking in the background.
Investigative reporting on local crime would be encouraged.  We would emphasize how local people are impacted by crime through putting a dollar amount the cost.  I would show how the process connects from start to finish.  We would show local people reacting to crime by showing a continuing process of one accused person in two-minute weekly rotating segment.  It would be called LOCALS.  The weekly segments would be titled based on the system; titles are called Arrest, Arraignment Day, Plea, and Lockdown.  That way each month, the audience would get to see the continuing story of the local criminal justice system.  The first minute would show the actual processing; the second minute would show those involved telling their side of the story of how their life is being impacted.  I would work hard to make sure that the crimes were not all inner city type problems such as drugs, but problems that involved people from all walks of life.


If a court story was leading the news, court actions may be discussed with a short blurb from an attorney or judge explaining the true nature of the system during the
5:03-5:08 time slot.  A few words about why plea-bargaining would probably be included.  I would use an image of the attorneys together with a voice-over stating, "plea-bargaining is how we working together to ensure justice".  The voice-over could end with a statistic about how many convictions resulted in the community over the previous year using plea-bargaining.  The segment might end with footage of a judge dropping the gavel handing down the sentence.


On the other hand, if a trial with a conviction occurred, the defendant would be shown in the background. In the foreground there would be large scrolling statistics across the television screen of how frequently trials end in conviction. 
The biggest challenge would be to change how police are portrayed.  First, I would limit the images of police handcuffing young black men unless it was absolutely integral to the plot to the story.  Second, we would do a few mini exposes on real police work.  We would follow the officers in the course of a day showing brief snippets of what they really do.  Third, we would show police talking to people in a civilized manner.  This must be done with whites and minority in proportion to the white and minority population.  We might have to stage this until police become acclimated to speak with respect to all manner of people in non-arrest situations.  Last, we would show that there may be hours of uneventful patrol and paperwork, but when emergencies happen they are effective in resolving many issues. 


Most segments would end with the cop making a gesture to apprehend the perpetrator.  These gestures may include sirens going off or a cop racing down the road in a patrol car.  This positive image and good will is necessary to keep the lines of communication open between law enforcement and journalism.  Because of the good will, our news team would request open access to all crime, not just the bloody stuff.  That way the journalist can make accurate comparisons for violent and nonviolent crimes and prepare news stories accordingly.
Prisons would be dealt with in a similar manner.  Stories about the impact of criminal laws on prisons would be inserted when possible.  When possible, interviews with prison guards and inmates would reinforce how real prison is and how it impacts many lives.  For high interest stories that end with prison time, a few moments would be devoted to showing that person behind bars.  Sound bytes that give explanations of life behind bars would be added to the pictures.  Some would address the high financial cost of crime.  Others would provide a commentary of why we need more prison monies or alternatives to incarceration.  Opinions of the correctional officers would often be inserted to give the newscast a documentary feel. 


At the same time I would launch an active campaign to inform the public that they are being victimized by scary statistics.   We would have an ongoing weekly presentation on the reality of crime in state, city and each community.  We would highlight what crimes occur most often in each community with occasional commentary on causes.  I would show reenactments of crimes using the actual ratio of how often different types of crime occurred.  We might see a lot of reenactments of domestic violence and theft but rarely would we see anything about satanic cults and murder.  With these rare crimes I would have experts come on to express to the audience how rare these occurrences are. 
A big part of the education campaign would be to show that there are those who want to manipulate the public by portraying crime as out of control. To counter that, comparisons about crime would include comparing crimes to other unusual life events.  For example I would show that your chances of being the victim of a serial murder are smaller than your chances of being struck by lightning. 
On slow news days, we would insert investigative reporting stories about criminal justice statewide.  I would try to tie in information about
Florida’s criminal justice system to local occurrences to provide evaluation on how our community is faring.  To portray the state criminal justice system honestly, I would contact criminologist, scholars, government records and key official to provide input. 
I would enact part two at the same time as the changes in news coverage.  I would call up local middle and high schools and work out a plan to get my people inside to do presentations about crime and journalism.  The goal of plan is to create a generational shift in thinking.   I would go in with the premise of teaching about the first amendment, or research or computer literacy.  In the process I would present a program on how to use media without being drawn into its hype.  


Part of the education would be teaching kids how to research true sources of information and vital statistics.  They would be taught to question the motives of politicians, journalist and spokespeople who decry outrageous crime trends.  They would be taught to look for legislation and evaluate how it will affect certain groups. I would teach kids how to recognize signs of public hysteria and trends and encourage them to write letters and emails to the press when they go onto their sensational tangents.  They would be encouraged to listen to what the politicians were saying and question it as well.  The children would take this message back home to their parents.  I would encourage the kids to discuss issues with their parents and ask them how they have been personally affected by crime.  Through this process the parents would feel a need to question the sensational media accounts.  Then I would have a market for "honest" reporting.
The foundation of  "honest" crime news is organizational support as well as support from newsmakers.  When good working relationships have been established, access to accurate information about police, courts and corrections can be accessed and used to create appropriate news stories.  A need for this type of news can be established by reeducating the public and school aged children to demand "honest" reporting.