Syllabus

Back Up Next

Home
APA Guide
Syllabus
Peer Review
Policies

Syllabus

 

Comparative Criminology and Criminal Justice

 

CCJ 5636
Distance Learning Course 
Summer 2007
FSU School of Criminology 
E-Mail: cgreek@mailer.fsu.edu
Personal Home Page:
http://home.earthlink.net/~cegreek/index.html

Office: Hecht House 219

 

Dr. Cecil Greek
Office Hours:
WF 8 AM-Noon 
Office Phone:
850-644-4746 
Home Phone:
850-906-0340
850-
339-4268 (cell)
Fax: 
850-644-9614

          

                                                   

 Required Texts:

  1. Andreas, Peter and Ethan Nadelmann. (2006). Policing the Globe: Criminalization and Crime Control in International Relations. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-508948-0

  2. Grabosky. P. (2001). Electronic Theft : Unlawful Acquisition in Cyberspace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  ISBN: 052180597X

  3. Mueller. John. (2006). Overblown: How Politicians and the Terrorism Industry Inflate National Security Threats, and Why We Believe Them. NY, NY: Free Press. ISBN-13: 978-1416541714

  4. Reichel, Philip. (ed.). (2005). Handbook of Transnational Crime and Justice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. ISBN: 0-7619-2622-4

  5. White, Jonathan. (2005). Terrorism and Homeland Security. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing. ISBN: 0534643817
     
  6. 9/11 Commission Report (Download PDF file)

  **Reading Schedule**

Course Summary:

The primary purpose of this course is to provide students with an introductory understanding of transnational criminal behavior and how contemporary nation states create criminal justice policies to attempt to thwart it. Among the crime topics to be discussed are: drug trafficking, arms trafficking, money laundering, trafficking in people, organized crime, terrorism, and cybercrime.

Given the difficulties in discussing crime from a comparative perspective, the course will follow an inductive method of instruction to see what types of conclusions can be supported by empirical evidence. How do we know with any degree of certainty the nature and extent of a society’s crime problems? Students will be asked to critically evaluate their own perspectives of crime and how these are based upon a combination of sources, including mass media, personal experiences, books, courses, and Web resources.

The course will focus on the current resources available for analyzing the extent of transnational crime. These include materials available from scholarly, journalistic, law enforcement agency sources, as well as Web sites set up ordinary citizens and in some cases, criminals themselves (e.g. hacker Web sites). Official crime statistics will be analyzed as to the their strengths and limitations.

 

The problems inherent in difficulty in defining crime cross-culturally will be covered, include the following issues: counting problems, varying legal definitions, and the fact that crime in one place may not be a crime in another (e.g. money laundering). We will attempt to locate countries that do define crimes similarly and those that do not.

 

Through a combination of books, other assigned readings, Web lectures, and Web searches, students will attempt to uncover what currently are considered serious transnational crime problems and which tend to get less attention. A common definition of transnational crime will be developed only after students have investigated current issues. Students will be asked to answer the following type questions:

bullet

 What is transnational crime?

bullet

Is transnational crime a real problem?

bullet

 How serious a problem is transnational crime?

bullet

What do governments gain by identifying these issues as transnationally significant (and not others such as capitalist exploitation of cheap labor, and so on)?

An important recognition will be that situations identified as crime problems and activities identified as criminal are socially constructed. Some problems will be labeled as serious and criminalized while others may be overlooked. Why for example, are drugs treated so seriously while global environmental pollution is not? Has the focus on global transnational terrorism become so all consuming that other important crime trends are being ignored?

By noting that local crime problems are identified as such as the result of a political process, students will be in a better position to see the relationship between crime and crime control policies. Policy plans a critical role within criminal justice (e.g. demand–reduction, medical model, selective incapacitation, zero tolerance). It is important to distinguish between factors that are apparently considered in creating a policy and those that appear to be ignored.

The course will focus on current criminal justice policies regarding the transnational crimes students identify as important. Students will conduct legal analyses of related laws.

Finally, the course will focus on whether existing specific criminal justice policies can be applied transnationally, and whether a need might exist for new global policies to deal with specified crime problem or problems.

Projects  and Assessments:

  As the students in this course will not meet face to face, projects are an essential element in keeping students focused, interacting with fellow students and the instructor, and providing feedback to the instructor that can be used for assessment purposes. Grades will be based upon class participation in the discussion forums and completion of the four course projects.

Students will be required to turn in written assignments each class, and post these to forum discussion. The threaded discussion is the heart and soul of interactive education outside of a classroom in the FSU Criminology model. This may change as technology changes, but right now, the threaded discussion is the best way for an instructor to conduct a class discussion whether the class is on-campus or scattered around the world. 

The threaded discussion is asynchronous.  Students do not have to immediately reply, but rather, can thoughtfully compose their response to a topic under discussion. To put it bluntly, the threaded discussion also is blind and deaf. The appearance, bearing and speaking skills of the student neither detract nor enhance their presentation.  Students' ideas and opinions stand on the merit of their logic and clarity of writing, not the charisma or body language of the speaker, or lack thereof. 

The threaded discussion is an equal opportunity activity. Aggressive students cannot dominate a discussion. Offensive students can be controlled. Passive students can be heard. In fact, all students will be heard, a rarity in most classrooms.

The strategies to use threaded discussion effectively to simulate classroom instruction and discussion include setting up forums as classroom questions, reflection questions, helpful links discussions, FAQ forums, reports, debates, and critiques.

In addition, to discussion forums students will be involved in a series of ongoing projects:

Project 1: Track news stories on a particular transnational crime and post to student’s Web journal.

Student will choose a particular crime of interest and track news stories appearing in on-line newspapers about that crime. The student will locate 3 stories per week, and write an online journal report about one of them. Student will critically assess the information in the news report, using the criteria learned in the course. This project will be ongoing starting in Week 1 through week 3.  

 

Project 2: Evaluate Transnational Crime Web Sites  

In assignment one, you tracked news media stories. For this assignment, visit nonjournalistic Web sites that discuss transnational crimes. Examples include scholarly materials (e.g., journals, online books), government reports, or United Nations documents. You can also visit personal Web cites, but watch out for the lunatic factor. You are free to change the category of crime you are researching.

After visiting a Web site, do two things:

(1) Post the URL and the name of the Web site you visited.

(Note: copying and pasting is the best way to enter the URL into the discussion forum post. Least chance of creating a "bad link." Check the link yourself to make sure what you have posted actually leads back to the page you want it to.) 

(2) Second, write an overview of what is available at the Web site (an annotation).

 

This assignment will start in week 4 and continue on through week 6.  

Project 3: Create a Successful Transnational Crime Venture

Write a plan for a criminal activity using the criteria in the definition of transnational crime generated earlier.

1. Options:

  1. Design an activity that is currently illegal or criminal (same?).
  2. Design an activity that is not yet classified as a transnational crime but may be classified as such if you are successful (i.e., moral entrepreneurs are aroused).

Describe how the criminal activity fits the transnational crime paradigm implied in the definition.

2. Why are you doing this?

  Motivation

bullet

 idealistic

bullet

political

bullet

 financial

bullet

other

 

3. How will you carry this out?

 

  Logistics

bullet

market

bullet

mode of delivery

bullet

materials necessary to accomplish the crime

 

  1. Cite laws or regulations in targeted countries that govern the specified activity based upon the countries targeted.

 

The project will be done in week 5.

 

Project 4: Develop a policy and create strategies for stopping transnational crime

Students will be asked to reverse roles from project 3 and become policy makers aimed at eradicating the spread of transnational crimes. In this new role, a student will be given another student’s plan for the successful commission of transnational crimes, and asked to develop the means to thwart the plan. Students will be asked to review current laws and policies for the impacted countries, test their adequacy, and devise new policy and strategy as needed.

The project will be done in week 6.

(For complete details on assignments, go to the assignments page.)

Course Grading Policy 

bulletGrades in this course will be based on assessment of both the 4 ongoing class assignments and class participation in discussion forums.
bulletDiscussions questions within Blackboard will account for 120 points, earned over the course of the semester (a possible 10 points per session over 12 sessions). 
bulletAssignment one is worth 90 points total. Nine points for your main post, 3 points for questions to fellow students and 3 points for follow-ups.
bulletAssignment 2 is worth 90 points total. Ten points for your main post and 5 points for follow ups.
bulletAssignments 3 and 4 are worth 100 points each.
bulletTotal points possible is 500

 

The grading scale for the course will be as follows:

Letter
Grade
Points
Required out of 500 possible
Average
A >465 93-100
A- 450-464 90-92
B+ 440-449 88-89
B 420-439 84-87
B- 400-419 80-83
C+ 390-399 78-79
C 370-389 74-77
C- 350-369 70-73

 

Back to Comparative Criminology Homepage
This page was last modified September 07, 2006
cgreek@mailer.fsu.edu