|
|
Syllabus
|
| CCJ
5636 Distance Learning Course Summer 2007 FSU School of Criminology E-Mail: cgreek@mailer.fsu.edu Personal Home Page: http://home.earthlink.net/~cegreek/index.html Office: Hecht House 219
|
Dr.
Cecil Greek Office Hours: WF 8 AM-Noon Office Phone: 850-644-4746 Home Phone: 850-906-0340 850-339-4268 (cell) Fax: 850-644-9614 |
![]()
|
![]()
The
primary purpose of this course is to provide students with an introductory
understanding of transnational criminal behavior and how contemporary nation
states create criminal justice policies to attempt to thwart it. Among the
crime topics to be discussed are: drug trafficking, arms trafficking, money
laundering, trafficking in people, organized crime, terrorism, and cybercrime.
Given
the difficulties in discussing crime from a comparative perspective, the
course will follow an inductive method of instruction to see what types of
conclusions can be supported by empirical evidence. How do we know with any
degree of certainty the nature and extent of a society’s crime problems?
Students will be asked to critically evaluate their own perspectives of crime
and how these are based upon a combination of sources, including mass media,
personal experiences, books, courses, and Web resources.
The
course will focus on the current resources available for analyzing the extent
of transnational crime. These include materials available from scholarly,
journalistic, law enforcement agency sources, as well as Web sites set up
ordinary citizens and in some cases, criminals themselves (e.g. hacker Web
sites). Official crime statistics will be analyzed as to the their strengths
and limitations.
The
problems inherent in difficulty in defining crime cross-culturally will be
covered, include the following issues: counting problems, varying legal
definitions, and the fact that crime in one place may not be a crime in
another (e.g. money laundering). We will attempt to locate countries that do
define crimes similarly and those that do not.
Through
a combination of books, other assigned readings, Web lectures, and Web
searches, students will attempt to uncover what currently are considered
serious transnational crime problems and which tend to get less attention. A
common definition of transnational crime will be developed only after students
have investigated current issues. Students will be asked to answer the
following type questions:
|
What
is transnational crime? | |
|
Is
transnational crime a real problem? | |
|
How
serious a problem is transnational crime? | |
|
What
do governments gain by identifying these issues as transnationally
significant (and not others such as capitalist exploitation of cheap
labor, and so on)? |
An
important recognition will be that situations identified as crime problems and
activities identified as criminal are socially constructed. Some problems will
be labeled as serious and criminalized while others may be overlooked. Why for
example, are drugs treated so seriously while global environmental pollution
is not?
![]()
Students
will be required to turn in written assignments each class, and post
these to forum discussion. The threaded discussion is the heart and soul of
interactive education outside of a classroom in the FSU Criminology model.
This may change as technology changes, but right now, the threaded discussion
is the best way for an instructor to conduct a class discussion whether the
class is on-campus or scattered around the world.
The
threaded discussion is asynchronous. Students
do not have to immediately reply, but rather, can thoughtfully compose their
response to a topic under discussion. To put it bluntly, the threaded
discussion also is blind and deaf. The appearance, bearing and speaking skills
of the student neither detract nor enhance their presentation.
Students' ideas and opinions stand on the merit of their logic and
clarity of writing, not the charisma or body language of the speaker, or lack
thereof.
The
threaded discussion is an equal opportunity activity. Aggressive students
cannot dominate a discussion. Offensive students can be controlled. Passive
students can be heard. In fact, all students will be heard, a rarity in most
classrooms.
The
strategies to use threaded discussion effectively to simulate classroom
instruction and discussion include setting up forums as classroom questions,
reflection questions, helpful links discussions, FAQ forums, reports, debates,
and critiques.
In
addition, to discussion forums students will be involved in a series of
ongoing projects:
Student
will choose a particular crime of interest and track news stories appearing in
on-line newspapers about that crime. The student will locate 3 stories per
week, and write an online journal report about one of them. Student will
critically assess the information in the news report, using the criteria
learned in the course. This project will be ongoing starting in Week 1
through week 3.
In assignment one, you tracked news media stories. For this assignment, visit nonjournalistic Web sites that discuss transnational crimes. Examples include scholarly materials (e.g., journals, online books), government reports, or United Nations documents. You can also visit personal Web cites, but watch out for the lunatic factor. You are free to change the category of crime you are researching.
After visiting a Web site, do two things:
(1) Post the URL and the name of the Web site you visited.
(Note: copying and pasting is the best way to enter the URL into the discussion forum post. Least chance of creating a "bad link." Check the link yourself to make sure what you have posted actually leads back to the page you want it to.)
(2) Second, write an overview of what is available at the Web site (an annotation).
This
assignment will start in week 4 and continue on through
week 6.
Write
a plan for a criminal activity using the criteria in the definition of
transnational crime generated earlier.
1.
Options:
Describe
how the criminal activity fits the transnational crime paradigm implied in the
definition.
2.
Why are you doing this?
Motivation
|
idealistic
| |
|
political
| |
|
financial
| |
|
other |
3.
How will you carry this out?
Logistics
|
market | |
|
mode
of delivery | |
|
materials
necessary to accomplish the crime |
The project will be done in week 5.
Students will be asked to reverse
roles from project 3 and become policy makers aimed at eradicating the spread
of transnational crimes. In this new role, a student will be given another
student’s plan for the successful commission of transnational crimes, and
asked to develop the means to thwart the plan. Students will be asked to
review current laws and policies for the impacted countries, test their
adequacy, and devise new policy and strategy as needed.
The project will be done in week 6.
(For complete
details on assignments, go to the assignments page.)
![]()
| Grades in this course will be based on assessment of both the 4 ongoing class assignments and class participation in discussion forums. | |
| Discussions questions within Blackboard will account for 120 points, earned over the course of the semester (a possible 10 points per session over 12 sessions). | |
| Assignment one is worth 90 points total. Nine points for your main post, 3 points for questions to fellow students and 3 points for follow-ups. | |
| Assignment 2 is worth 90 points total. Ten points for your main post and 5 points for follow ups. | |
| Assignments 3 and 4 are worth 100 points each. | |
| Total points possible is 500 |
The grading scale for the course will be as follows:
Letter
GradePoints
Required out of 500 possibleAverage A >465 93-100 A- 450-464 90-92 B+ 440-449 88-89 B 420-439 84-87 B- 400-419 80-83 C+ 390-399 78-79 C 370-389 74-77 C- 350-369 70-73
|
Back to Comparative Criminology Homepage |